Zeiss scopes
Re: Zeiss scopes
I have a Zeiss Conquest MC 3-9x40 variable and a Zeiss Conquest MC 4x32 fixed. They are great. I love the Zeiss duplex reticle.
I'm planning to sell some stuff this year and get a Zeiss Conquest HD5 3-15x42 or 3-15x50. The reviews on the Conquest HD5 scopes are very good. They are over $1000 new, but you can get into a demo or open box unit for $700 - $800 from Doug at cameralandny.com with no sales tax and free shipping.
I am also thinking about taking the plunge on a set of Conquest HD 8x32 binos if I can scratch up the cash. They run $900 new, but cameralandny.com sells demo units for $675 with no sales tax and free shipping.
I'm planning to sell some stuff this year and get a Zeiss Conquest HD5 3-15x42 or 3-15x50. The reviews on the Conquest HD5 scopes are very good. They are over $1000 new, but you can get into a demo or open box unit for $700 - $800 from Doug at cameralandny.com with no sales tax and free shipping.
I am also thinking about taking the plunge on a set of Conquest HD 8x32 binos if I can scratch up the cash. They run $900 new, but cameralandny.com sells demo units for $675 with no sales tax and free shipping.
Re: Zeiss scopes
Man I would love to have the 3x15 I am sure it is an awesome scope. I bought a Minox 3x15x42 and it has been a big disappointment.
Re: Zeiss scopes
Love my Zeiss
Like my Minox too....
Like my Minox too....
The only dumb questions are those never asked!!!!
- 280longshot
- 6 Point
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:33 am
- Location: Drummonds
Re: Zeiss scopes
I thought that I had the best scope that I could afford when I bought my Leupold until I tried a Zeiss.
I still can't convince some of my buddies how much clearer they are compared to their Leupolds
I still can't convince some of my buddies how much clearer they are compared to their Leupolds
- Smokyrider
- 10 Point
- Posts: 1069
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 4:28 pm
- Location: Maryville, TN
Re: Zeiss scopes
Couple years ago I bought a Nikon Monarch for my .308 but the reticle was too thin and reflected light under certain conditions making the reticle look gold. Since I had not mounted it I sent it back for a Sightron II Big Sky and it is pretty good.
But a week after I got the the Sightron the Ziess Conquest had a hundred rebate for it, I could have gotten into a Ziess for what I paid for the Sightron. Still kicking myself that I missed getting a Ziess, get a Ziess if you get a chance.
But a week after I got the the Sightron the Ziess Conquest had a hundred rebate for it, I could have gotten into a Ziess for what I paid for the Sightron. Still kicking myself that I missed getting a Ziess, get a Ziess if you get a chance.
Re: Zeiss scopes
I have an SII Big Sky. I think you are the only one I've run across that also has one. I think it's an excellent scope. Honestly, I would put it in the same category as my Zeiss Conquest in terms of performance.Smokyrider wrote:Couple years ago I bought a Nikon Monarch for my .308 but the reticle was too thin and reflected light under certain conditions making the reticle look gold. Since I had not mounted it I sent it back for a Sightron II Big Sky and it is pretty good.
But a week after I got the the Sightron the Ziess Conquest had a hundred rebate for it, I could have gotten into a Ziess for what I paid for the Sightron. Still kicking myself that I missed getting a Ziess, get a Ziess if you get a chance.
- Smokyrider
- 10 Point
- Posts: 1069
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 4:28 pm
- Location: Maryville, TN
Re: Zeiss scopes
Good to know, I'm happy with it but I liked the rapid-z 600 reticle and it is my understanding that the thickness of Ziess reticles is good in low light situations.Creeping Death wrote:I have an SII Big Sky. I think you are the only one I've run across that also has one. I think it's an excellent scope. Honestly, I would put it in the same category as my Zeiss Conquest in terms of performance.Smokyrider wrote:Couple years ago I bought a Nikon Monarch for my .308 but the reticle was too thin and reflected light under certain conditions making the reticle look gold. Since I had not mounted it I sent it back for a Sightron II Big Sky and it is pretty good.
But a week after I got the the Sightron the Ziess Conquest had a hundred rebate for it, I could have gotten into a Ziess for what I paid for the Sightron. Still kicking myself that I missed getting a Ziess, get a Ziess if you get a chance.
Re: Zeiss scopes
Ziess for me although I still like Leupold....
Re: Zeiss scopes
I just did a basic side-by-side comparison of my 3-9x40 Zeiss Conquest and my 3-9x42 Sightron SII Big Sky. Both have standard plex reticles. The crosshairs are very similar in thickness. They are so close I can't tell which one is thicker. Honestly, looking at them side-by-side in mid-day I think I actually prefer the SII Big Sky just slightly. I should do a side-by-side after sundown to see how they compare under low light conditions.Smokyrider wrote:Good to know, I'm happy with it but I liked the rapid-z 600 reticle and it is my understanding that the thickness of Ziess reticles is good in low light situations.Creeping Death wrote:I have an SII Big Sky. I think you are the only one I've run across that also has one. I think it's an excellent scope. Honestly, I would put it in the same category as my Zeiss Conquest in terms of performance.Smokyrider wrote:Couple years ago I bought a Nikon Monarch for my .308 but the reticle was too thin and reflected light under certain conditions making the reticle look gold. Since I had not mounted it I sent it back for a Sightron II Big Sky and it is pretty good.
But a week after I got the the Sightron the Ziess Conquest had a hundred rebate for it, I could have gotten into a Ziess for what I paid for the Sightron. Still kicking myself that I missed getting a Ziess, get a Ziess if you get a chance.
- Smokyrider
- 10 Point
- Posts: 1069
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 4:28 pm
- Location: Maryville, TN
Re: Zeiss scopes
I have the 3-12X42 mil-dot Big Sky, so I can see the dots in low light but I liked the rapid-z 600 and figured it would be better. If they are comparable, then I will be completely content with my purchase. So the Big Sky if you want something good for a little less but the Ziess if you can afford it and don't look back.Creeping Death wrote: I just did a basic side-by-side comparison of my 3-9x40 Zeiss Conquest and my 3-9x42 Sightron SII Big Sky. Both have standard plex reticles. The crosshairs are very similar in thickness. They are so close I can't tell which one is thicker. Honestly, looking at them side-by-side in mid-day I think I actually prefer the SII Big Sky just slightly. I should do a side-by-side after sundown to see how they compare under low light conditions.
Still interested in your low light comparison as that is the time you are most likely to see deer.
Re: Zeiss scopes
I have a Nikon monarch 2.5x10x44 that I really liked until I started looking at a deer on evening just before dark it was awful. I couldn't see anything! I went back the next evening with a different rifle which had a Zeiss 3x9x40. I looked at the same area at the same time as the night before. There was no comparison between the 2 scopes. That's part of what sold me on Zeiss.
- Tru-Talker
- 6 Point
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 5:08 pm
- Location: Everywhere you're not....
- Contact:
Re: Zeiss scopes
My favorite is my Schmidt & Bender 2.5x10x56.... I've got a Zeiss Diavari and a Conquest.. Can't tell a whole lotta difference between the Conquest and Diavari....But the Schmidt blows em all away...... It's my go to evening hunt gun.....
Before you embark on a journey of revenge, dig two graves....
Re: Zeiss scopes
Just got a Zeiss 5X25 50mm on sale at Cabelas in Ft. Oglethorpe. Love it.....